[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGETcx_411fVxsM-ZMK7j2Bvkmi2TKPbzSuD+03M3cb7WKHfJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 15:03:01 -0800
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: abel.vesa@...aro.org, alexander.stein@...tq-group.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, bigunclemax@...il.com,
brgl@...ev.pl, colin.foster@...advantage.com,
cristian.marussi@....com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
dianders@...omium.org, djrscally@...il.com,
dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, festevam@...il.com, fido_max@...ox.ru,
frowand.list@...il.com, geert+renesas@...der.be,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, jpb@...nel.org,
jstultz@...gle.com, kernel-team@...roid.com, kernel@...gutronix.de,
lenb@...nel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-imx@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, lkft@...aro.org, luca.weiss@...rphone.com,
magnus.damm@...il.com, martin.kepplinger@...i.sm, maz@...nel.org,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, rafael@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
shawnguo@...nel.org, sudeep.holla@....com, tglx@...utronix.de,
tony@...mide.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] fw_devlink improvements
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 12:56 AM Naresh Kamboju
<naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Build test pass on arm, arm64, i386, mips, parisc, powerpc, riscv, s390, sh,
> sparc and x86_64.
>
> Boot and LTP smoke pass on qemu-arm64, qemu-armv7, qemu-i386 and qemu-x86_64.
> Boot failed on FVP.
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> Please refer following link for details of testing.
> FVP boot log failed.
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/~anders.roxell/linux-mainline-patches/build/lore_kernel_org_linux-devicetree_20230127001141_407071-1-saravanak_google_com/testrun/14389034/suite/boot/test/gcc-12-lkftconfig-64k_page_size/details/
Sudeep pointed me to what the issue might be. But it's strange that
you are hitting an issue now. I'm pretty sure I haven't changed this
part since v1. I'd also expect the limited assumptions I made to have
not been affected between v1 and v2.
Anyway, I'll look at this and fix it in v3.
-Saravana
Powered by blists - more mailing lists