linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] pata_parport: add driver (PARIDE replacement)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Jan 2023 16:10:48 +0900
From:   Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Ondrej Zary <linux@...y.sk>, Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>,
        Tim Waugh <tim@...erelk.net>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-parport@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] pata_parport: add driver (PARIDE replacement)

On 1/30/23 15:48, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 08:44:06PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> I would prefer if we just delete it after merging this one, in the same
>> release. I don't think there's any point in delaying, as we're not
>> removing any functionality.
>>
>> You could just queue that up too when adding this patch.
> 
> I'd prefer to just deprecate.  But most importantly I want this patch
> in ASAP in some form.

I will queue it. But I think it needs a follow up to result in something
consistent with KConfig. So either deprecate or delete PARPORT. I can queue the
deprecate patch and delete in 6.4, even though I share Jen's opinion to simply
delete directly. I am still fine either way.

Jens,

If you are OK with that, can I get your ack for the deprecate patch ? Unless you
prefer taking it through the block tree. Either way is fine with me.

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research