linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] riscv: support arch_has_hw_pte

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230130082239.xptbyeqskdczm6ns@orel>
Date:   Mon, 30 Jan 2023 09:22:39 +0100
From:   Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
To:     Jinyu Tang <tjytimi@....com>
Cc:     palmer@...osinc.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
        yuzhao@...gle.com, conor.dooley@...rochip.com, guoren@...nel.org,
        tongtiangen@...wei.com, anup@...infault.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, falcon@...ylab.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] riscv: support arch_has_hw_pte_young()

On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 02:49:56PM +0800, Jinyu Tang wrote:
> The arch_has_hw_pte_young() is false for riscv by default. If it's
> false, page table walk is almost skipped for MGLRU reclaim. And it
> will also cause useless step in __wp_page_copy_user().
> 
> RISC-V Privileged Book says that riscv have two schemes to manage A
> and D bit.
> 
> So add a config for selecting, the default is true. For simple
> implementation riscv CPU which just generate page fault, unselect it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jinyu Tang <tjytimi@....com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/Kconfig               | 10 ++++++++++
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h |  7 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index e2b656043abf..17c82885549c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -180,6 +180,16 @@ config PAGE_OFFSET
>  	default 0x80000000 if 64BIT && !MMU
>  	default 0xff60000000000000 if 64BIT
>  
> +config ARCH_HAS_HARDWARE_PTE_YOUNG
> +	bool "Hardware Set PTE Access Bit"
> +	default y
> +	help
> +	  Select if hardware set A bit when PTE is accessed. The default is
> +	  'Y', because most RISC-V CPU hardware can manage A and D bit.
> +	  But RISC-V may have simple implementation that do not support
> +	  hardware set A bit but only generate page fault, for that case just
> +	  unselect it.
> +
>  config KASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET
>  	hex
>  	depends on KASAN_GENERIC
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 4eba9a98d0e3..1db54ab4e1ba 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -532,6 +532,13 @@ static inline int ptep_clear_flush_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	 */
>  	return ptep_test_and_clear_young(vma, address, ptep);
>  }
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_HARDWARE_PTE_YOUNG
> +#define arch_has_hw_pte_young arch_has_hw_pte_young
> +static inline bool arch_has_hw_pte_young(void)
> +{
> +	return true;
> +}
> +#endif
>  
>  #define pgprot_noncached pgprot_noncached
>  static inline pgprot_t pgprot_noncached(pgprot_t _prot)
> -- 
> 2.30.2
>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>

Thanks,
drew