lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <31eb3b12-3350-90a4-a0d9-d1494db7cf74@oracle.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Jan 2023 15:04:09 +0530
From:   Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>
To:     linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     William ROCHE <william.roche@...cle.com>,
        Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@...cle.com>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "harshit.m.mogalapalli@...il.com" <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...il.com>
Subject: [bug-report] rasdaemon doesnot report new records.

Hi,

Since kernel 6.1-rc6 rasdaemon fails to update the summary of the records.

When we inject MCE errors, generally ras-mc-ctl --summary should be able
to read new errors, but starting from 6.1-rc6 the summary(count on
number of MCE records) doesnot udpate when we inject new mce errors.

This started happening after this commit
42fb0a1e84ff525ebe560e2baf9451ab69127e2b ("tracing/ring-buffer: Have
polling block on watermark") -- Commit landed first in 6.1-rc6, 6.1-rc5 
kernel doesnot have this problem.

On reverting this commit, rasdaemon works good(i.e It is able to read
the new mce records).

This continues to happen on latest kernel(v6.2-rc6) as well.

In a Good case -- 6.2-rc6 + revert of 42fb0a1e84ff 
("tracing/ring-buffer: Have polling block on watermark"), post poll read 
happens without being stuck.

openat(AT_FDCWD, 
"/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/instances/rasdaemon/per_cpu/cpu0/trace_pipe_raw", 
O_RDONLY) = 4
openat(AT_FDCWD, 
"/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/instances/rasdaemon/per_cpu/cpu1/trace_pipe_raw", 
O_RDONLY) = 5
openat(AT_FDCWD, 
"/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/instances/rasdaemon/per_cpu/cpu2/trace_pipe_raw", 
O_RDONLY) = 6
openat(AT_FDCWD, 
"/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/instances/rasdaemon/per_cpu/cpu3/trace_pipe_raw", 
O_RDONLY) = 7
[...]
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=5, events=POLLIN}, {fd=6, 
events=POLLIN}, {fd=7, events=POLLIN}, {fd=8, events=POLLIN}], 5, -1) = 
1 ([{fd=4, revents=POLLIN}])
read(4, 
"\215~\0\0\0\0\0\0t\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\34\t\2\0\263\0\0\0#\0\0\0\n\1\0\t"..., 
4096) = 4096
newfstatat(AT_FDCWD, "/etc/localtime", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, 
st_size=114, ...}, 0) = 0
write(2, "rasdaemon: ", 11rasdaemon: )             = 11
write(2, "mce_record store: 0x56047b270008"..., 33mce_record store: 
0x56047b270008
) = 33


In a case where new records are not updated in summary: -- 6.2-rc6
The reason why the database of records isn't populated, is simply 
because rasdaemon doesn't get notified anymore by the kernel:

openat(AT_FDCWD, 
"/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/instances/rasdaemon/per_cpu/cpu0/trace_pipe_raw", 
O_RDONLY) = 4
openat(AT_FDCWD, 
"/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/instances/rasdaemon/per_cpu/cpu1/trace_pipe_raw", 
O_RDONLY) = 5
openat(AT_FDCWD, 
"/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/instances/rasdaemon/per_cpu/cpu2/trace_pipe_raw", 
O_RDONLY) = 6
openat(AT_FDCWD, 
"/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/instances/rasdaemon/per_cpu/cpu3/trace_pipe_raw", 
O_RDONLY) = 7
[...]
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=5, events=POLLIN}, {fd=6, 
events=POLLIN}, {fd=7, events=POLLIN}, {fd=8, events=POLLIN}], 5, -1

--- Stuck here even when we inject MCE-errors.


Before the Commit 42fb0a1e84ff ("tracing/ring-buffer: Have polling block 
on watermark"), an error injection could wake the poll() call on the 
above special files, and I can confirm that the subsequent read() call 
did not hang. With the Commit 42fb0a1e84ff, an error injection doesn't 
wake the poll() call anymore.

We need to let rasdaemon (or any other trace consumer using the per_cpu 
files) retrieve the available information as soon as it is available.

Additional info:
1. 
https://github.com/mchehab/rasdaemon/blob/master/ras-events.c#:~:text=ready%20%3D%20poll(fds%2C%20(n_cpus%20%2B%201)%2C%20%2D1)%3B 
this is the code which is getting hit on rasdaemon side.

2. Changing the buffer_percent to a lower value didnot change the behaviour.


Thanks,
Harshit





Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ