linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V6 3/3] clk: meson: s4: add support for Amlogic S4 SoC peripheral clock controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e2e9045a-6e35-112f-69a7-15b080571b69@amlogic.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Jan 2023 17:41:14 +0800
From:   Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com>
To:     Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
CC:     "kelvin . zhang" <Kelvin.Zhang@...ogic.com>,
        "qi . duan" <qi.duan@...ogic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 3/3] clk: meson: s4: add support for Amlogic S4 SoC
 peripheral clock controller



On 2023/1/30 17:06, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
> 
> 
> On Sat 28 Jan 2023 at 18:17, Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2023/1/20 17:47, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>> On Fri 20 Jan 2023 at 11:33, Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>> On 2023/1/19 19:37, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>>>>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>>>> On Mon 16 Jan 2023 at 15:42, Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Add the peripherals clock controller driver in the s4 SoC family.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +/* Video Clocks */
>>>>>> +static struct clk_regmap s4_vid_pll_div = {
>>>>>> +	.data = &(struct meson_vid_pll_div_data){
>>>>>> +		.val = {
>>>>>> +			.reg_off = CLKCTRL_VID_PLL_CLK_DIV,
>>>>>> +			.shift   = 0,
>>>>>> +			.width   = 15,
>>>>>> +		},
>>>>>> +		.sel = {
>>>>>> +			.reg_off = CLKCTRL_VID_PLL_CLK_DIV,
>>>>>> +			.shift   = 16,
>>>>>> +			.width   = 2,
>>>>>> +		},
>>>>>> +	},
>>>>>> +	.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data) {
>>>>>> +		.name = "vid_pll_div",
>>>>>> +		/*
>>>>>> +		 * The frequency division from the hdmi_pll clock to the vid_pll_div
>>>>>> +		 * clock is the default value of this register. When designing the
>>>>>> +		 * video module of the chip, a default value that can meet the
>>>>>> +		 * requirements of the video module will be solidified according
>>>>>> +		 * to the usage requirements of the chip, so as to facilitate chip
>>>>>> +		 * simulation. So this is ro_ops.
>>>>>> +		 * It is important to note that this clock is not used on this
>>>>>> +		 * chip and is described only for the integrity of the clock tree.
>>>>>> +		 */
>>>>> If it is reset value and will be applicable to all the design, regarless
>>>>> of the use-case, then yes RO ops is OK
>>>>>
>>>>> >From what I understand here, the value will depend on the use-case requirements.
>>>>> This is a typical case where the DT prop "assigned-rate" should be used, not RO ops.
>>>>
>>>> Check the previous chip history, the actual scene is not used at all,
>>>> basically is used in simulation. So the previous SOC was "ro_ops" without
>>>> any problems.  This S4 SOC is not actually useful either.
>>>>
>>>> So when you were upstream, you had no problem making "ro_ops". I wonder if
>>>> I could delete this useless clock, so you don't have to worry about it.
>>> I don't know what to make of this. What is the point of adding a useless
>>> clock ?
>>
>> As explained earlier this "vid_pll_div" is actually used in chip
>> emulation. So next I'd like to know what you suggest to do with the clock?
>>
> 
> If it does not exist in the actual SoC, please remove it
> 

If I remove it, the "vid_pll_sel" clock will be missing a parent 
(vid_pll_div). I will use the table method and give the above reasons. 
Do you accept this method?