lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72miWD_MtTrC0Ua7o4Tk5oDbQSFefwmYCsGx3Y=85ziJfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Jan 2023 13:00:07 +0100
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
        Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
        rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] kbuild: srcrpm-pkg: create source package without cleaning

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 2:29 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> I guess you are talking about kernel-devel-*.rpm
> (and linux-headers-.deb).
>
> They are not useful for building external modules
> written in Rust since they do not contain *.rmeta etc.
> I am not caring about that because Rust support is not
> mature enough yet.

Yeah, that is what I meant, i.e. since the Rust ML was Cc'd, I checked
and wanted to say removing `rust` from there was OK (an `Acked-by`
seemed too much for just that line :).

> I stopped hard-coding the top-level directories.
> The resulting source package still contains all check-in files
> under rust/, so it is good from the source package perspective.

Sounds good to me.

> 5/5 changed the behavior because rpm-pkg re-uses the
> *.src.rpm generated by srcrpm-pkg.

(3/5?)

> Having *.src.rpm in the kernel tree seems Redhat's preference.
> Commit 8818039f959b2efc0d6f2cb101f8061332f0c77e
> added --define='_srcrpmdir $(srctree)'.

Thanks for the details! I just noticed it, so I thought I would let
you know just in case.

(Perhaps it could be useful to mention this change in the output in
the commit message.)

> In contrast, binary rpm files are generated under rpmbuild/RPMS/.
> I want to fix this inconsistency, though.

That would be nice.

Cheers,
Miguel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ