linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: aspeed: Force to disable the function's signal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Jan 2023 03:06:46 +0000
From:   Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
        Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@...eedtech.com>,
        linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: aspeed: Force to disable the function's signal

On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 12:39, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 2:54 AM Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au> wrote:
>
> > As foreseen by Andrew, this caused a regression. On the Romulus
> > machine the device tree contains a gpio hog for GPIO S7. With the
> > patch applied:
>
> OK shall I just revert the patch?

Yep! I was going to send a revert but I thought I should write up a
commit message. If you're happy just putting a revert in with a note
that it caused a regression that's enough for me.