[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f53bb96-8213-12f1-f91c-7fb311e4c9a4@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 16:07:02 +0000
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
Florian Fischer <florian.fischer@...q.space>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>,
Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Kang Minchul <tegongkang@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>,
Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Perry Taylor <perry.taylor@...el.com>,
Caleb Biggers <caleb.biggers@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/15] perf jevents: Generate metrics and events as
separate tables
On 26/01/2023 23:36, Ian Rogers wrote:
> @@ -660,7 +763,29 @@ const struct pmu_events_table *perf_pmu__find_events_table(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
>
> const struct pmu_metrics_table *perf_pmu__find_metrics_table(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
> {
> - return (struct pmu_metrics_table *)perf_pmu__find_events_table(pmu);
> + const struct pmu_metrics_table *table = NULL;
> + char *cpuid = perf_pmu__getcpuid(pmu);
> + int i;
> +
> + /* on some platforms which uses cpus map, cpuid can be NULL for
> + * PMUs other than CORE PMUs.
> + */
> + if (!cpuid)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + i = 0;
> + for (;;) {
> + const struct pmu_events_map *map = &pmu_events_map[i++];
> + if (!map->arch)
> + break;
> +
> + if (!strcmp_cpuid_str(map->cpuid, cpuid)) {
> + table = &map->metric_table;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + free(cpuid);
> + return table;
> }
This is almost identical to generated perf_pmu__find_events_table(),
except we return a pmu_metrics_table * (instead of a pmu_events_table *)
and also return the metric table member (instead of event table). But
the definitions are:
/* Struct used to make the PMU event table implementation opaque to
callers. */
struct pmu_events_table {
const struct compact_pmu_event *entries;
size_t length;
};
/* Struct used to make the PMU metric table implementation opaque to
callers. */
struct pmu_metrics_table {
const struct compact_pmu_event *entries;
size_t length;
};
Those structs are defined to be the same thing, so I am failing to see
the point in a) separate structure types b) why so much duplication
As for b), I know that they are generated and the python code may be
simpler this way (is it?), but still...
Thanks,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists