linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 00/10] Add MediaTek MT7986 SPI NAND and ECC support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Jan 2023 17:33:55 +0100
From:   Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Xiangsheng Hou <xiangsheng.hou@...iatek.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@...il.com>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, benliang.zhao@...iatek.com,
        bin.zhang@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 00/10] Add MediaTek MT7986 SPI NAND and ECC
 support

Hi Xiangsheng,

broonie@...nel.org wrote on Mon, 30 Jan 2023 16:18:56 +0000:

> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 05:11:45PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > xiangsheng.hou@...iatek.com wrote on Mon, 30 Jan 2023 11:06:46 +0800:  
> 
> > > This patch series add MediaTek MT7986 SPI NAND and ECC controller
> > > support, split ECC engine with rawnand controller in bindings and
> > > change to YAML schema.  
> 
> > I would like to pick-up patches 3, 7 and 10 and apply them in the mtd
> > tree as they look completely orthogonal with all the other (spi/DT)
> > changes, am I right?  
> 
> > Mark, is it okay for you?  
> 
> That's fine, assuming there's no dependency issues.  Xiangsheng, it's
> generally best to avoid mixing patches for multiple subsystems into a
> single series when it's not needed since it makes merging things more
> complex.

Well, kernel test robot just reported an issue with a wrong file name,
so let's split the series. I now expect a series with the spi and
relevant changes (for Mark) and another series with the three mtd
patches -fixed, of course- which I'll apply on my side.

Thanks, Miquèl