[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9kxkhmS+yEs85s1@kadam>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 18:19:46 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To: Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>,
Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>,
Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: fix NULL check for rcu pointer
[ Resending because my email setup is crap and silently eats my out
going mail. ]
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 10:00:57AM +0100, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> Fix the NULL check for padapter->pnetdev->rx_handler_data.
>
> The current code calls rcu_dereference while it holds the rcu read lock
> and checks the pointer after releasing the lock. An rcu pointer may only be
> used between calls to rcu_read_lock and rcu_read_unlock.
>
> Replace the check with rcu_access_pointer. My understanding is that this
> function returns the value of the pointer and needs no locking. We can
> then check the pointer but we must not dereference it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
This patch is fine but it's a clean up and not a fix. The original code
doesn't dereference "br_port". I guess the new code is faster and
especially if you have lockdep enabled, so maybe in that sense it is a
fix.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists