linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] thermal: intel: int340x: Improve int340x_thermal_set_trip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 31 Jan 2023 16:39:45 +0100
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] thermal: intel: int340x: Improve
 int340x_thermal_set_trip_temp()

On 30/01/2023 19:47, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> Instead of using snprintf() to populate the ACPI object name in
> int340x_thermal_set_trip_temp(), use an appropriate initializer
> and make the function fail if its trip argument is greater than 9,
> because ACPI object names can only be 4 characters long and it does
> not make sense to even try to evaluate objects with longer names (that
> argument is guaranteed to be non-negative, because it comes from the
> thermal code that will not pass negative trip numbers to zone
> callbacks).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog