linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] genirq: Use hlist for managing resend handlers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <182e3214-0f60-8b65-5981-23d2a2ea54b9@nvidia.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 Jan 2023 10:17:21 -0600
From:   Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] genirq: Use hlist for managing resend handlers



On 1/31/23 02:59, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29 2023 at 18:57, Shanker Donthineni wrote:
>> +/* hlist_head to handle software resend of interrupts: */
>> +static HLIST_HEAD(irq_resend_list);
>> +static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(irq_resend_lock);
>>
>>   /*
>>    * Run software resends of IRQ's
>> @@ -30,18 +31,16 @@ static DECLARE_BITMAP(irqs_resend, IRQ_BITMAP_BITS);
>>   static void resend_irqs(struct tasklet_struct *unused)
>>   {
>>        struct irq_desc *desc;
>> -     int irq;
>> -
>> -     while (!bitmap_empty(irqs_resend, nr_irqs)) {
>> -             irq = find_first_bit(irqs_resend, nr_irqs);
>> -             clear_bit(irq, irqs_resend);
>> -             desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
>> -             if (!desc)
>> -                     continue;
>> +     struct hlist_node *n;
>> +
>> +     raw_spin_lock_irq(&irq_resend_lock);
>> +     hlist_for_each_entry_safe(desc, n, &irq_resend_list, resend_node) {
>> +             hlist_del_init(&desc->resend_node);
>>                local_irq_disable();
>>                desc->handle_irq(desc);
>>                local_irq_enable();
>>        }
>> +     raw_spin_unlock_irq(&irq_resend_lock);
> The lock ordering is broken here. irq_sw_resend() is invoked with
> desc->lock held and takes irq_resend_lock.
> 
> Lockdep clearly would have told you...
> 
>          raw_spin_lock_irq(&irq_resend_lock);
>          while (!hlist_empty(...)) {
>                  desc = hlist_entry(irq_resend_list.first, ...);
>                  hlist_del_init(&desc->resend_node);
>                  raw_spin_unlock(&...);
>                  desc->handle_irq();
>                  raw_spin_lock(&...);
>          }

Thanks for catching mistakes, I'll change it to this, please correct me if
I'm doing another mistake.

static void resend_irqs(struct tasklet_struct *unused)
{
         struct irq_desc *desc;

         raw_spin_lock_irq(&irq_resend_lock);
         while (hlist_empty(&irq_resend_list)) {
                 desc = hlist_entry(irq_resend_list.first, struct irq_desc,
                                    resend_node);
                 hlist_del_init(&desc->resend_node);
                 raw_spin_unlock(&irq_resend_lock);
                 desc->handle_irq(desc);
                 raw_spin_lock(&irq_resend_lock);
         }
         raw_spin_unlock_irq(&irq_resend_lock);
}

Thanks,
Shanker