[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230131171227.3912130-7-dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 17:12:20 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 06/13] rxrpc: Generate extra pings for RTT during heavy-receive call
When doing a call that has a single transmitted data packet and a massive
amount of received data packets, we only ping for one RTT sample, which
means we don't get a good reading on it.
Fix this by converting occasional IDLE ACKs into PING ACKs to elicit a
response.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>
cc: linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org
---
include/trace/events/rxrpc.h | 3 ++-
net/rxrpc/call_event.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
net/rxrpc/output.c | 7 +++++--
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h b/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
index cdcadb1345dc..450b8f345814 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
@@ -360,11 +360,12 @@
EM(rxrpc_propose_ack_client_tx_end, "ClTxEnd") \
EM(rxrpc_propose_ack_input_data, "DataIn ") \
EM(rxrpc_propose_ack_input_data_hole, "DataInH") \
- EM(rxrpc_propose_ack_ping_for_check_life, "ChkLife") \
EM(rxrpc_propose_ack_ping_for_keepalive, "KeepAlv") \
EM(rxrpc_propose_ack_ping_for_lost_ack, "LostAck") \
EM(rxrpc_propose_ack_ping_for_lost_reply, "LostRpl") \
+ EM(rxrpc_propose_ack_ping_for_old_rtt, "OldRtt ") \
EM(rxrpc_propose_ack_ping_for_params, "Params ") \
+ EM(rxrpc_propose_ack_ping_for_rtt, "Rtt ") \
EM(rxrpc_propose_ack_processing_op, "ProcOp ") \
EM(rxrpc_propose_ack_respond_to_ack, "Rsp2Ack") \
EM(rxrpc_propose_ack_respond_to_ping, "Rsp2Png") \
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/call_event.c b/net/rxrpc/call_event.c
index 1abdef15debc..cf9799be4286 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/call_event.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/call_event.c
@@ -498,9 +498,18 @@ bool rxrpc_input_call_event(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *skb)
rxrpc_send_ACK(call, RXRPC_ACK_IDLE, 0,
rxrpc_propose_ack_rx_idle);
- if (atomic_read(&call->ackr_nr_unacked) > 2)
- rxrpc_send_ACK(call, RXRPC_ACK_IDLE, 0,
- rxrpc_propose_ack_input_data);
+ if (atomic_read(&call->ackr_nr_unacked) > 2) {
+ if (call->peer->rtt_count < 3)
+ rxrpc_send_ACK(call, RXRPC_ACK_PING, 0,
+ rxrpc_propose_ack_ping_for_rtt);
+ else if (ktime_before(ktime_add_ms(call->peer->rtt_last_req, 1000),
+ ktime_get_real()))
+ rxrpc_send_ACK(call, RXRPC_ACK_PING, 0,
+ rxrpc_propose_ack_ping_for_old_rtt);
+ else
+ rxrpc_send_ACK(call, RXRPC_ACK_IDLE, 0,
+ rxrpc_propose_ack_input_data);
+ }
/* Make sure the timer is restarted */
if (!__rxrpc_call_is_complete(call)) {
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/output.c b/net/rxrpc/output.c
index a9746be29634..98b5d0db7761 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/output.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/output.c
@@ -253,12 +253,15 @@ int rxrpc_send_ack_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct rxrpc_txbuf *txb)
iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, WRITE, iov, 1, len);
ret = do_udp_sendmsg(conn->local->socket, &msg, len);
call->peer->last_tx_at = ktime_get_seconds();
- if (ret < 0)
+ if (ret < 0) {
trace_rxrpc_tx_fail(call->debug_id, serial, ret,
rxrpc_tx_point_call_ack);
- else
+ } else {
trace_rxrpc_tx_packet(call->debug_id, &txb->wire,
rxrpc_tx_point_call_ack);
+ if (txb->wire.flags & RXRPC_REQUEST_ACK)
+ call->peer->rtt_last_req = ktime_get_real();
+ }
rxrpc_tx_backoff(call, ret);
if (!__rxrpc_call_is_complete(call)) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists