linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,dp-video-phy: deprecate syscon phandle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a3fdb1a7-0585-6282-0b84-27c82a35244b@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 31 Jan 2023 18:32:05 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
        replicant@...osl.org, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        Martin Jücker <martin.juecker@...il.com>,
        Henrik Grimler <henrik@...mler.se>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,dp-video-phy: deprecate
 syscon phandle

On 27/01/2023 20:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The DisplayPort phy is actually part of the Power Management Unit system
> controller, thus it should be its child, instead of sibling node with
> syscon phandle.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,dp-video-phy.yaml        | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Hi Vinod,

It turns out, my previous patch (1/8, which I took via Samsung SoC)
actually depends on these here. Without these here it causes warning.
That 1/8 patch is already in soc tree and will be for v6.3. Will you be
taking these for v6.3? If not, could you Ack and I will take them.

Best regards,
Krzysztof