linux-kernel - RE: [RFC PATCH V3 06/16] x86/hyperv: decrypt vmbus pages for sev-snp enlightened guest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 31 Jan 2023 17:58:52 +0000
From:   "Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
To:     Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>,
        "luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "jgross@...e.com" <jgross@...e.com>,
        Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
        "kirill@...temov.name" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        "jiangshan.ljs@...group.com" <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "ashish.kalra@....com" <ashish.kalra@....com>,
        "srutherford@...gle.com" <srutherford@...gle.com>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "anshuman.khandual@....com" <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        "pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com" 
        <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
        "adrian.hunter@...el.com" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        "daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com" <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
        "alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com" 
        <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        "sandipan.das@....com" <sandipan.das@....com>,
        "ray.huang@....com" <ray.huang@....com>,
        "brijesh.singh@....com" <brijesh.singh@....com>,
        "michael.roth@....com" <michael.roth@....com>,
        "thomas.lendacky@....com" <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        "venu.busireddy@...cle.com" <venu.busireddy@...cle.com>,
        "sterritt@...gle.com" <sterritt@...gle.com>,
        "tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "samitolvanen@...gle.com" <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        "fenghua.yu@...el.com" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH V3 06/16] x86/hyperv: decrypt vmbus pages for sev-snp
 enlightened guest

From: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com> Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2023 6:46 PM
> 

As I comment on v2 of this patch, the Subject prefix should be
"Drivers: hv: vmbus:"

> Vmbus post msg, synic event and message pages are shared

s/Vmbus/VMBus/

We're trying to be consistent about the capitalization of "VMBus"
in comments and other text. :-)

> with hypervisor and so decrypt these pages in the sev-snp guest.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tianyu Lan <tiala@...rosoft.com>
> ---
> Change since RFC V2:
>        * Fix error in the error code path and encrypt
>        	 pages correctly when decryption failure happens.
> ---
>  drivers/hv/hv.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv.c b/drivers/hv/hv.c
> index 410e6c4e80d3..52edc54c8172 100644
> --- a/drivers/hv/hv.c
> +++ b/drivers/hv/hv.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <clocksource/hyperv_timer.h>
>  #include <asm/mshyperv.h>
> +#include <linux/set_memory.h>
>  #include "hyperv_vmbus.h"
> 
>  /* The one and only */
> @@ -117,7 +118,7 @@ int hv_post_message(union hv_connection_id connection_id,
> 
>  int hv_synic_alloc(void)
>  {
> -	int cpu;
> +	int cpu, ret;
>  	struct hv_per_cpu_context *hv_cpu;
> 
>  	/*
> @@ -168,9 +169,39 @@ int hv_synic_alloc(void)
>  			pr_err("Unable to allocate post msg page\n");
>  			goto err;
>  		}
> +
> +		if (hv_isolation_type_en_snp()) {
> +			ret = set_memory_decrypted((unsigned long)
> +				hv_cpu->synic_message_page, 1);
> +			if (ret)
> +				goto err;
> +
> +			ret = set_memory_decrypted((unsigned long)
> +				hv_cpu->synic_event_page, 1);
> +			if (ret)
> +				goto err_decrypt_event_page;
> +
> +			ret = set_memory_decrypted((unsigned long)
> +				hv_cpu->post_msg_page, 1);
> +			if (ret)
> +				goto err_decrypt_msg_page;
> +
> +			memset(hv_cpu->synic_message_page, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> +			memset(hv_cpu->synic_event_page, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> +			memset(hv_cpu->post_msg_page, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> +		}

Having decrypted the pages here in hv_synic_alloc(), shouldn't
there be corresponding re-encryption in hv_synic_free()?

>  	}
> 
>  	return 0;
> +
> +err_decrypt_msg_page:
> +	set_memory_encrypted((unsigned long)
> +		hv_cpu->synic_event_page, 1);
> +
> +err_decrypt_event_page:
> +	set_memory_encrypted((unsigned long)
> +		hv_cpu->synic_message_page, 1);
> +
>  err:
>  	/*
>  	 * Any memory allocations that succeeded will be freed when
> --
> 2.25.1