lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 31 Jan 2023 20:26:17 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>,
        agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
        shawnguo@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org,
        marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com, nfraprado@...labora.com,
        robimarko@...il.com, quic_gurus@...cinc.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 8/9] arm64: dts: qcom: add IPQ5332 SoC and MI01.2 board
 support

On 30/01/2023 12:47, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote:
> From: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>
> 
> Add initial device tree support for the Qualcomm IPQ5332 SoC and
> MI01.2 board.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>


> +		sdhc: mmc@...4000 {
> +			compatible = "qcom,ipq5332-sdhci", "qcom,sdhci-msm-v5";
> +			reg = <0x07804000 0x1000>, <0x07805000 0x1000>;
> +
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 313 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +				     <GIC_SPI 316 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			interrupt-names = "hc_irq", "pwr_irq";
> +
> +			clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_AHB_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_APPS_CLK>,
> +				 <&xo_board>;
> +			clock-names = "iface", "core", "xo";
> +			mmc-ddr-1_8v;
> +			mmc-hs200-1_8v;

No, our discussion did not finish. These are not properties of the SoC
in most cases. Why do you say there are part of the SoC? Is your SoC
coming with the same memory? Memory embedded in the SoC, not in the
board? If yes, the status is incorrect.

> +			max-frequency = <192000000>;

Same


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ