linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 00/13] add support for the the vsc7512 internal copper phys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y9lyMEDfvQQybtor@COLIN-DESKTOP1.localdomain>
Date:   Tue, 31 Jan 2023 11:55:28 -0800
From:   Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        richardcochran@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        claudiu.manoil@....com, vladimir.oltean@....com, pabeni@...hat.com,
        edumazet@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 00/13] add support for the the vsc7512
 internal copper phys

On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 11:45:38AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 09:06:22 +0000 Lee Jones wrote:
> > Please don't do that.  The commits do not have proper Acked-by tags.
> > 
> > The plan is to merge these via MFD and send out a pull-request to an
> > immutable branch.  However, if you're prepared to convert all of the:
> > 
> >   Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
> > 
> > to
> > 
> >   Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
> 
> Sorry, I must have been blind yesterday because I definitely double
> checked this doesn't touch mfd code. And it does :/
> 
> The patches should not be sent for net-next if they are not supposed 
> to be applied directly. Or at the very least says something about
> merging in the cover letter!

My apologies. I wasn't sure how these cross-tree syncs would be done
(and I recognize Lee even asked during a previous submission.) I'll be
more verbose in cover letters moving forward, should I ever be
submitting against multiple trees like this.