[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2be3109edf0c29178aab58705ed2cf60b6b30a62.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 23:36:14 +0100
From: Angel Iglesias <ang.iglesiasg@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] iio: pressure: bmp280: Add nvmem operations for
BMP580
On Mon, 2023-01-30 at 14:29 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 02:33:09AM +0100, Angel Iglesias wrote:
> > The pressure sensor BMP580 contains a non-volatile memory that stores
> > trimming and configuration params. That memory provides an programmable
> > user range of three 2-byte words.
>
> ...
>
> > +#define NVM_READ false
> > +#define NVM_WRITE true
>
> How is it helpful and why it's not namespaced properly (can collide with
> NVM framework)?
I thought it could provide clarity using those aliases calling
bmp580_nvm_operation() helper function on nvmen callbacks, instead of using
just true or false. Not my brightest idea for sure.
> ...
>
> > + /* Wait until NVM is ready again */
> > + do {
> > + ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, BMP580_REG_STATUS, ®);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(data->dev, "failed to check nvm status\n");
> > + reg &= ~BMP580_STATUS_NVM_RDY_MASK;
> > + }
> > + } while (time_before(jiffies, deadline) && !(reg &
> > BMP580_STATUS_NVM_RDY_MASK));
>
> regmap_read_poll_timeout()?
Yes, thanks for pointing out, that's way better than the current loop.
>
> > + if (!(reg & BMP580_STATUS_NVM_RDY_MASK)) {
>
> if (ret) {
> ...
> return ret;
> }
>
> > + dev_err(data->dev,
> > + "reached timeout waiting for nvm operation
> > completion\n");
> > + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > + }
>
> ...
>
> > + while (bytes >= sizeof(u16)) {
>
> sizeof(*dst) ?
>
> Or sizeof(data->le16)?
>
> > + addr = bmp580_nvmem_addrs[offset / sizeof(u16)];
>
> Ditto.
>
> ...
>
> > + bytes -= sizeof(u16);
> > + offset += sizeof(u16);
>
> Ditto.
>
> > + }
>
> ...
>
> > +static int bmp580_nvmem_write(void *priv, unsigned int offset, void *val,
> > + size_t bytes)
> > +{
>
> Same comments as per above function.
Got it!
> > }
>
>
Thanks for your time,
Angel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists