[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQKpkuBdQWWGDBh13NCrx2WMPs4fVUyVujF4L-6XnjXFpg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:25:54 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...gle.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] selftests/bpf: use canonical ftrace path
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 11:50 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> As code in the Linux kernel is used as examples for future work, it should
> not be using an interface that is obsolete. That's enough rational for code
> churn.
Fair enough. Please resubmit these two patches towards bpf-next
with [PATCH bpf-next] subj, so that BPF CI can chew on it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists