| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <43095d93-29c8-b30a-08c0-0a452770c1ce@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:32:12 -0800
From: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
<freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v2 2/3] drm/msm/dsi: Stop unconditionally powering up
DSI hosts at modeset
On 1/31/2023 2:18 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> In commit 7d8e9a90509f ("drm/msm/dsi: move DSI host powerup to modeset
> time"), we moved powering up DSI hosts to modeset time. This wasn't
> because it was an elegant design, but there were no better options.
>
> That commit actually ended up breaking ps8640, and thus was born
> commit ec7981e6c614 ("drm/msm/dsi: don't powerup at modeset time for
> parade-ps8640") as a temporary hack to un-break ps8640 by moving it to
> the old way of doing things. It turns out that ps8640 _really_ doesn't
> like its pre_enable() function to be called after
> dsi_mgr_bridge_power_on(). Specifically (from experimentation, not
> because I have any inside knowledge), it looks like the assertion of
> "RST#" in the ps8640 runtime resume handler seems like it's not
> allowed to happen after dsi_mgr_bridge_power_on()
>
> Recently, Dave Stevenson's series landed allowing bridges some control
> over pre_enable ordering. The meaty commit for our purposes is commit
> 4fb912e5e190 ("drm/bridge: Introduce pre_enable_prev_first to alter
> bridge init order"). As documented by that series, if a bridge doesn't
> set "pre_enable_prev_first" then we should use the old ordering.
>
> Now that we have the commit ("drm/bridge: tc358762: Set
> pre_enable_prev_first") we can go back to the old ordering, which also
> allows us to remove the ps8640 special case.
>
> One last note is that even without reverting commit 7d8e9a90509f
> ("drm/msm/dsi: move DSI host powerup to modeset time"), if you _just_
> revert the ps8640 special case and try it out then it doesn't seem to
> fail anymore. I spent time bisecting / debugging this and it turns out
> to be mostly luck, so we still want this patch to make sure it's
> solid. Specifically the reason it sorta works these days is because
> we implemented wait_hpd_asserted() in ps8640 now, plus the magic of
> "pm_runtime" autosuspend. The fact that we have wait_hpd_asserted()
> implemented means that we actually power the bridge chip up just a wee
> bit earlier and then the bridge happens to stay on because of
> autosuspend and thus ends up powered before dsi_mgr_bridge_power_on().
>
> Cc: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>
> Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> Cc: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Don't fold dsi_mgr_bridge_power_on() back into dsi_mgr_bridge_pre_enable()
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_manager.c | 38 +--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_manager.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_manager.c
> index 1bbac72dad35..2197a54b9b96 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_manager.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_manager.c
> @@ -34,32 +34,6 @@ static struct msm_dsi_manager msm_dsim_glb;
> #define IS_SYNC_NEEDED() (msm_dsim_glb.is_sync_needed)
> #define IS_MASTER_DSI_LINK(id) (msm_dsim_glb.master_dsi_link_id == id)
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> -static bool dsi_mgr_power_on_early(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> -{
> - struct drm_bridge *next_bridge = drm_bridge_get_next_bridge(bridge);
> -
> - /*
> - * If the next bridge in the chain is the Parade ps8640 bridge chip
> - * then don't power on early since it seems to violate the expectations
> - * of the firmware that the bridge chip is running.
> - *
> - * NOTE: this is expected to be a temporary special case. It's expected
> - * that we'll eventually have a framework that allows the next level
> - * bridge to indicate whether it needs us to power on before it or
> - * after it. When that framework is in place then we'll use it and
> - * remove this special case.
> - */
> - return !(next_bridge && next_bridge->of_node &&
> - of_device_is_compatible(next_bridge->of_node, "parade,ps8640"));
> -}
> -#else
> -static inline bool dsi_mgr_power_on_early(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> -{
> - return true;
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> static inline struct msm_dsi *dsi_mgr_get_dsi(int id)
> {
> return msm_dsim_glb.dsi[id];
> @@ -265,12 +239,6 @@ static void dsi_mgr_bridge_power_on(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> int ret;
>
> DBG("id=%d", id);
> - if (!msm_dsi_device_connected(msm_dsi))
> - return;
> -
> - /* Do nothing with the host if it is slave-DSI in case of bonded DSI */
> - if (is_bonded_dsi && !IS_MASTER_DSI_LINK(id))
> - return;
>
Why are these two checks removed?
> ret = dsi_mgr_phy_enable(id, phy_shared_timings);
> if (ret)
> @@ -327,8 +295,7 @@ static void dsi_mgr_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> if (is_bonded_dsi && !IS_MASTER_DSI_LINK(id))
> return;
>
> - if (!dsi_mgr_power_on_early(bridge))
> - dsi_mgr_bridge_power_on(bridge);
> + dsi_mgr_bridge_power_on(bridge);
>
> ret = msm_dsi_host_enable(host);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -438,9 +405,6 @@ static void dsi_mgr_bridge_mode_set(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> msm_dsi_host_set_display_mode(host, adjusted_mode);
> if (is_bonded_dsi && other_dsi)
> msm_dsi_host_set_display_mode(other_dsi->host, adjusted_mode);
> -
> - if (dsi_mgr_power_on_early(bridge))
> - dsi_mgr_bridge_power_on(bridge);
> }
>
> static enum drm_mode_status dsi_mgr_bridge_mode_valid(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists