lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <68dde5cf-e02b-fc90-f331-091065f019a6@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 1 Feb 2023 00:41:32 +0100
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 8/8] thermal: intel: intel_pch: Refer to thermal zone
 name directly

On 31/01/2023 20:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 5:02 PM Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 30/01/2023 20:07, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>>>
>>> Make intel_pch_thermal_probe() use a const char pointer instead of
>>> a struct board_info one for accessing the thermal zone name.
>>>
>>> No intentional functional impact.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> BTW, Srinivas, I'm wondering if user space would be terribly confused by
>>> changing this driver to use "Intel PCH" as the thermal zone name of all
>>> of the supported platforms?
>>>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c |    6 +++---
>>>    1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Index: linux-pm/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c
>>> +++ linux-pm/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c
>>> @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static int intel_pch_thermal_probe(struc
>>>                                   const struct pci_device_id *id)
>>>    {
>>>        enum pch_board_ids board_id = id->driver_data;
>>> -     const struct board_info *bi = &board_info[board_id];
>>> +     const char *zone_name = board_info[board_id].name;
>>
>> Assuming you will change 'board_info[board_id].name' by
>> 'board_info[board_id]'
> 
> Hmm, why would that be required?

I meant board_names[board_id] (related to the change proposed in the 
patch replacement below)

>> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> 
> Anyway, though, I'm planning to use this replacement patch instead of
> the $subject one:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/12166249.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher/

-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ