linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] ftrace: Add DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_CALL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <60ec7607-7c5c-1a6e-18c9-8025cb2f289f@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 Jan 2023 09:25:51 +0800
From:   "Wangshaobo (bobo)" <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
CC:     <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        <lenb@...nel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        <peterz@...radead.org>, <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        <revest@...omium.org>, <robert.moore@...el.com>,
        <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <will@...nel.org>,
        "liwei (GF)" <liwei391@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] ftrace: Add DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_CALL_OPS



在 2023/1/30 18:25, Mark Rutland 写道:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 04:46:48PM +0800, Wangshaobo (bobo) wrote:
>> 锟斤拷 2023/1/23 21:45, Mark Rutland 写锟斤拷:
>>> +config DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_CALL_OPS
>>> +	def_bool y
>>> +	depends on HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_CALL_OPS
>>> +
>> Hi Mark,
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> I have test your patches and it looks fine with my sample module,
> 
> Thanks for testing!
> 
>> but here setting DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_CALL_OPS to y immutably may increase the
>> .text section size by 5% or more, how about making this to optional^^
> 
> We could consider making this optional. I had not made this optional so far as
> in the future I'd like to make this the only implementation of ftrace on arm64
> (once we can drop the old mcount version, and once we've sorted out the
> incompatibility with CFI). In the mean time, it probably makes sense to have
> the option at least to enable testing of each of the two forms.
> 
> Is your concern that the overall kernel image size is larger, or do you care
> specifically about the size of the .text section for some reason?
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark
Embedded devices may pay more attention to Image size, and which may 
also indirectly affects performance, for more reason, I think making 
sense to have the option for testing is more important.

-- Wang ShaoBo
> 
>>
>> -- Wang ShaoBo
>>>    config DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
>>>    	def_bool y
>>>    	depends on DYNAMIC_FTRACE
>>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>>> index 442438b93fe9..e634b80f49d1 100644