[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6e8c90b-08ba-ccf9-8704-97c995722ea5@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 20:17:25 +0800
From: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Stefan Talpalaru <stefantalpalaru@...oo.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Peter Zilstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Martin Pohlack <mpohlack@...zon.de>
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 Part2 1/9] x86/microcode: Taint kernel only if
microcode loading was successful
On 2023/1/31 5:39, Ashok Raj wrote:
> Currently when late loading is aborted due to check_online_cpu(), kernel
> still ends up tainting the kernel.
>
> Taint only when microcode loading was successful.
>
> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> Cc: x86 <x86@...nel.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
> Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>
> Cc: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner (Intel) <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> Cc: Stefan Talpalaru <stefantalpalaru@...oo.com>
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zilstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> Cc: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com>
> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
> Cc: Martin Pohlack <mpohlack@...zon.de>
> ---
> v1->v2: (Thomas)
> - Remove unnecessary assignment of ret that's being overwritten.
> - Taint kernel only of loading was successful
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> index 61d57d9b93ee..1c6831b8b244 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> @@ -472,7 +472,8 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct device *dev,
> enum ucode_state tmp_ret = UCODE_OK;
> int bsp = boot_cpu_data.cpu_index;
> unsigned long val;
> - ssize_t ret = 0;
> + int load_ret = -1;
> + ssize_t ret;
>
> ret = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val);
> if (ret)
> @@ -488,20 +489,26 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct device *dev,
> goto put;
>
> tmp_ret = microcode_ops->request_microcode_fw(bsp, µcode_pdev->dev);
> - if (tmp_ret != UCODE_NEW)
> + if (tmp_ret != UCODE_NEW) {
> + ret = size;
> goto put;
> + }
>
> mutex_lock(µcode_mutex);
> - ret = microcode_reload_late();
> + load_ret = microcode_reload_late();
> mutex_unlock(µcode_mutex);
>
> put:
> cpus_read_unlock();
>
> - if (ret == 0)
> + /*
> + * Taint only when loading was successful
> + */
> + if (load_ret == 0) {
> ret = size;
What about if loading was not successful(load_ret != 0)?
ret has no chance to be returned as size here and we'll run into the
endless update?
Thanks,
-Aubrey
> -
> - add_taint(TAINT_CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
> + add_taint(TAINT_CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
> + pr_warn("Microcode late loading tainted the kernel\n");
> + }
>
> return ret;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists