[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9kO1egKjKNqE0zg@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 12:51:33 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] arm64/signal: Signal handling cleanups
Hi Mark,
On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 08:25:15PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> This series collects a number of small cleanups to the signal handling
> code which removes redundant validation of size information and avoids
> reading the same data from userspace twice.
>
> There are some overlaps with both the TPIDR2 signal handling and SME2
> serieses which are also in flight, applying this will require
> adjustments in those serieses and vice versa.
[...]
> Mark Brown (6):
> arm64/signal: Don't redundantly verify FPSIMD magic
> arm64/signal: Remove redundant size validation from parse_user_sigframe()
> arm64/signal: Make interface for restore_fpsimd_context() consistent
I'm fine with the first three patches, they seem correct and make the
frame checking more consistent.
> arm64/signal: Avoid rereading context frame sizes
> arm64/signal: Only read new data when parsing the SVE context
> arm64/signal: Only read new data when parsing the ZA context
I'm not sure these add much to the code readability (and the performance
improvement I guess is negligible). We avoid some copy_from_user() into
the context structures but rely on data read previously or some
get_user() into local variables. Personally I'd make the
restore_fpsimd_context() also do a copy_from_user() for consistency with
the current sve and za frames restoring.
Personal preference, not sure whether Will has the same view.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists