[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3791872.1675172490@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 13:41:30 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] iov_iter: Improve page extraction (pin or just list)
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
> >> percpu counters maybe - add them up at the point of viewing?
> > They are percpu, see my last email. But for every 108 changes (on
> > my system), they will do two atomic_long_adds(). So not very
> > useful for anything but low frequency modifications.
> >
>
> Can we just treat the whole acquired/released accounting as a debug mechanism
> to detect missing releases and do it only for debug kernels?
>
>
> The pcpu counter is an s8, so we have to flush on a regular basis and cannot
> really defer it any longer ... but I'm curious if it would be of any help to
> only have a single PINNED counter that goes into both directions (inc/dec on
> pin/release), to reduce the flushing.
>
> Of course, once we pin/release more than ~108 pages in one go or we switch
> CPUs frequently it won't be that much of a help ...
What are the stats actually used for? Is it just debugging, or do we actually
have users for them (control groups spring to mind)?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists