lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <167517556557.691302.14946061846357129320.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 31 Jan 2023 14:32:45 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] regmap: apply reg_base and reg_downshift for
 single register ops

On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 02:04:57 +0000, Daniel Golle wrote:
> reg_base and reg_downshift currently don't have any effect if used with
> a regmap_bus or regmap_config which only offers single register
> operations (ie. reg_read, reg_write and optionally reg_update_bits).
> 
> Fix that and take them into account also for regmap_bus with only
> reg_read and read_write operations by applying reg_base and
> reg_downshift in _regmap_bus_reg_write, _regmap_bus_reg_read.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regmap.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regmap: apply reg_base and reg_downshift for single register ops
      commit: 697c3892d825fb78f42ec8e53bed065dd728db3e

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ