[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f26ac524-3a74-94de-8817-11ab13802493@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:54:24 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/8] thermal: intel: intel_pch: Eliminate redundant
return pointers
On 30/01/2023 19:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Both pch_wpt_init() and pch_wpt_get_temp() can return the proper
> result via their return values, so they do not need to use return
> pointers.
>
> Modify them accordingly.
>
> No intentional functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists