linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] arm64/vmalloc: use module region only for module_alloc() if CONFIG_RANDOMIZE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230131150644.GA2605@willie-the-truck>
Date:   Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:06:45 +0000
From:   Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] arm64/vmalloc: use module region only for
 module_alloc() if CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE is set

+Ard -- full thread here:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221227092634.445212-1-liushixin2@huawei.com/

On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 01:41:47PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 10:44:31 +0800 Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > 
> > This patch seems to have been lost in the corner. Recently I've meet this problem again
> > 
> > on v6.1, so I would like to propose this patch again.
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > 
> > On 2022/12/27 17:26, Liu Shixin wrote:
> > > After I add a 10GB pmem device, I got the following error message when
> > > insert module:
> > >
> > >  insmod: vmalloc error: size 16384, vm_struct allocation failed,
> > >  mode:0xcc0(GFP_KERNEL), nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0
> > >
> > > If CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE is set, the module region can be located in the
> > > vmalloc region entirely. Although module_alloc() can fall back to a 2GB
> > > window if ARM64_MODULE_PLTS is set, the module region is still easily
> > > exhausted because the module region is located at bottom of vmalloc region
> > > and the vmalloc region is allocated from bottom to top.
> > >
> > > Skip module region if not calling from module_alloc().
> > >
> 
> I'll assume this is for the arm tree.
> 
> Acked-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>

This looks like the same issue previously reported at:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/e6a804de-a5f7-c551-ffba-e09d04e438fc@hisilicon.com/

where Ard had a few suggestions but, afaict, they didn't help.

Will