[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230201173016.342758-5-void@manifault.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 11:30:16 -0600
From: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, yhs@...a.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...a.com, corbet@....net, hch@...radead.org,
acme@...nel.org, alan.maguire@...cle.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add testcase for static kfunc with unused arg
kfuncs are allowed to be static, or not use one or more of their
arguments. For example, bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash() in net/core/xdp.c is
meant to be implemented by drivers, with the default implementation just
returning -EOPNOTSUPP. As described in [0], such kfuncs can have their
arguments elided, which can cause BTF encoding to be skipped. The new
__bpf_kfunc macro should address this, and this patch adds a selftest
which verifies that a static kfunc with at least one unused argument can
still be encoded and invoked by a BPF program.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>
---
net/bpf/test_run.c | 6 ++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c | 11 +++++++++++
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index af9827c4b351..e6f773d12045 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -741,6 +741,11 @@ __bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_call_test_destructive(void)
{
}
+__bpf_kfunc static u32 bpf_kfunc_call_test_static_unused_arg(u32 arg, u32 unused)
+{
+ return arg;
+}
+
__diag_pop();
BTF_SET8_START(bpf_test_modify_return_ids)
@@ -779,6 +784,7 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail1)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail2)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_ref, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_destructive, KF_DESTRUCTIVE)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_static_unused_arg)
BTF_SET8_END(test_sk_check_kfunc_ids)
static void *bpf_test_init(const union bpf_attr *kattr, u32 user_size,
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
index bb4cd82a788a..a543742cd7bd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ static struct kfunc_test_params kfunc_tests[] = {
TC_TEST(kfunc_call_test_get_mem, 42),
SYSCALL_TEST(kfunc_syscall_test, 0),
SYSCALL_NULL_CTX_TEST(kfunc_syscall_test_null, 0),
+ TC_TEST(kfunc_call_test_static_unused_arg, 0),
};
struct syscall_test_args {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c
index d91c58d06d38..7daa8f5720b9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(void *mem, int len) __ksym;
extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail2(__u64 *mem, int len) __ksym;
extern int *bpf_kfunc_call_test_get_rdwr_mem(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p, const int rdwr_buf_size) __ksym;
extern int *bpf_kfunc_call_test_get_rdonly_mem(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p, const int rdonly_buf_size) __ksym;
+extern u32 bpf_kfunc_call_test_static_unused_arg(u32 arg, u32 unused) __ksym;
SEC("tc")
int kfunc_call_test4(struct __sk_buff *skb)
@@ -181,4 +182,14 @@ int kfunc_call_test_get_mem(struct __sk_buff *skb)
return ret;
}
+SEC("tc")
+int kfunc_call_test_static_unused_arg(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+
+ u32 expected = 5, actual;
+
+ actual = bpf_kfunc_call_test_static_unused_arg(expected, 0xdeadbeef);
+ return actual != expected ? -1 : 0;
+}
+
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.39.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists