linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 3/3] ima: Handle -ESTALE returned by ima_filter_rule

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Feb 2023 10:39:52 +0800
From:   GUO Zihua <guozihua@...wei.com>
To:     <stable@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <paul@...l-moore.com>, <luhuaxin1@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 3/3] ima: Handle -ESTALE returned by ima_filter_rule_match()

[ Upstream commit c7423dbdbc9ecef7fff5239d144cad4b9887f4de ]

IMA relies on the blocking LSM policy notifier callback to update the
LSM based IMA policy rules.

When SELinux update its policies, IMA would be notified and starts
updating all its lsm rules one-by-one. During this time, -ESTALE would
be returned by ima_filter_rule_match() if it is called with a LSM rule
that has not yet been updated. In ima_match_rules(), -ESTALE is not
handled, and the LSM rule is considered a match, causing extra files
to be measured by IMA.

Fix it by re-initializing a temporary rule if -ESTALE is returned by
ima_filter_rule_match(). The origin rule in the rule list would be
updated by the LSM policy notifier callback.

Fixes: b16942455193 ("ima: use the lsm policy update notifier")
Signed-off-by: GUO Zihua <guozihua@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: GUO Zihua <guozihua@...wei.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 5a15524bca4c..9d500a06c710 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -375,6 +375,9 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
 			    enum ima_hooks func, int mask)
 {
 	int i;
+	bool result = false;
+	struct ima_rule_entry *lsm_rule = rule;
+	bool rule_reinitialized = false;
 
 	if ((rule->flags & IMA_FUNC) &&
 	    (rule->func != func && func != POST_SETATTR))
@@ -413,35 +416,53 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
 		int rc = 0;
 		u32 osid;
 
-		if (!rule->lsm[i].rule)
+		if (!lsm_rule->lsm[i].rule)
 			continue;
 
+retry:
 		switch (i) {
 		case LSM_OBJ_USER:
 		case LSM_OBJ_ROLE:
 		case LSM_OBJ_TYPE:
 			security_inode_getsecid(inode, &osid);
 			rc = security_filter_rule_match(osid,
-							rule->lsm[i].type,
+							lsm_rule->lsm[i].type,
 							Audit_equal,
-							rule->lsm[i].rule,
+							lsm_rule->lsm[i].rule,
 							NULL);
 			break;
 		case LSM_SUBJ_USER:
 		case LSM_SUBJ_ROLE:
 		case LSM_SUBJ_TYPE:
 			rc = security_filter_rule_match(secid,
-							rule->lsm[i].type,
+							lsm_rule->lsm[i].type,
 							Audit_equal,
-							rule->lsm[i].rule,
+							lsm_rule->lsm[i].rule,
 							NULL);
 		default:
 			break;
 		}
-		if (!rc)
-			return false;
+
+		if (rc == -ESTALE && !rule_reinitialized) {
+			lsm_rule = ima_lsm_copy_rule(rule);
+			if (lsm_rule) {
+				rule_reinitialized = true;
+				goto retry;
+			}
+		}
+		if (!rc) {
+			result = false;
+			goto out;
+		}
+	}
+	result = true;
+
+out:
+	if (rule_reinitialized) {
+		ima_lsm_free_rule(lsm_rule);
+		kfree(lsm_rule);
 	}
-	return true;
+	return result;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.17.1