[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9qwJtOaKrgB5n+T@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 20:32:06 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] gpiolib: remove gpio_set_debounce
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 09:44:31PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:11:46AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
...
> > - return !gpio_get_value(ts->gpio_pendown);
> > + return !gpiod_get_value(ts->gpio_pendown);
>
> No, we can not blindly do that without checking annotations on GPIOs.
But this is easy to fix, i.e. use raw API, no?
> > + ts->gpio_pendown = gpiod_get(&spi->dev, "pendown-gpio", GPIOD_IN);
>
> Wrong name, you will be looking for "pendown-gpio-gpios".
>
> Sorry, but I have to NAK this in the current form.
Oh, indeed. On top of that the conversion missing the label to be set.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists