linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 01/14] perf: RISC-V: Define helper functions expose hpm counter width and count

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed,  1 Feb 2023 15:12:37 -0800
From:   Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
        Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
        Eric Lin <eric.lin@...ive.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 01/14] perf: RISC-V: Define helper functions expose hpm counter width and count

KVM module needs to know how many hardware counters and the counter
width that the platform supports. Otherwise, it will not be able to show
optimal value of virtual counters to the guest. The virtual hardware
counters also need to have the same width as the logical hardware
counters for simplicity. However, there shouldn't be mapping between
virtual hardware counters and logical hardware counters. As we don't
support hetergeneous harts or counters with different width as of now,
the implementation relies on the counter width of the first available
programmable counter.

Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
---
 drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c   | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h |  3 +++
 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
index f6507ef..6b53adc 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group *riscv_pmu_attr_groups[] = {
 };
 
 /*
- * RISC-V doesn't have hetergenous harts yet. This need to be part of
+ * RISC-V doesn't have heterogeneous harts yet. This need to be part of
  * per_cpu in case of harts with different pmu counters
  */
 static union sbi_pmu_ctr_info *pmu_ctr_list;
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ static bool riscv_pmu_use_irq;
 static unsigned int riscv_pmu_irq_num;
 static unsigned int riscv_pmu_irq;
 
+/* Cache the available counters in a bitmask */
+static unsigned long cmask;
+
 struct sbi_pmu_event_data {
 	union {
 		union {
@@ -267,6 +270,37 @@ static bool pmu_sbi_ctr_is_fw(int cidx)
 	return (info->type == SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_FW) ? true : false;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Returns the counter width of a programmable counter and number of hardware
+ * counters. As we don't support heterogeneous CPUs yet, it is okay to just
+ * return the counter width of the first programmable counter.
+ */
+int riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info(u32 *hw_ctr_width, u32 *num_hw_ctr)
+{
+	int i;
+	union sbi_pmu_ctr_info *info;
+	u32 hpm_width = 0, hpm_count = 0;
+
+	if (!cmask)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	for_each_set_bit(i, &cmask, RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS) {
+		info = &pmu_ctr_list[i];
+		if (!info)
+			continue;
+		if (!hpm_width && info->csr != CSR_CYCLE && info->csr != CSR_INSTRET)
+			hpm_width = info->width;
+		if (info->type == SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_HW)
+			hpm_count++;
+	}
+
+	*hw_ctr_width = hpm_width;
+	*num_hw_ctr = hpm_count;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info);
+
 static int pmu_sbi_ctr_get_idx(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
@@ -812,7 +846,6 @@ static void riscv_pmu_destroy(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
 static int pmu_sbi_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct riscv_pmu *pmu = NULL;
-	unsigned long cmask = 0;
 	int ret = -ENODEV;
 	int num_counters;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
index e17e86a..a1c3f77 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
@@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ void riscv_pmu_legacy_skip_init(void);
 static inline void riscv_pmu_legacy_skip_init(void) {};
 #endif
 struct riscv_pmu *riscv_pmu_alloc(void);
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI
+int riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info(u32 *hw_ctr_width, u32 *num_hw_ctr);
+#endif
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_PMU */
 
-- 
2.25.1