lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230201162730.685b5332.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Feb 2023 16:27:30 -0700
From:   Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To:     Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     pbonzini@...hat.com, yi.l.liu@...el.com, jgg@...dia.com,
        cohuck@...hat.com, farman@...ux.ibm.com, pmorel@...ux.ibm.com,
        borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
        imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com, akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com,
        jjherne@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
        zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com, zhi.a.wang@...el.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
        kevin.tian@...el.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vfio: fix deadlock between group lock and kvm lock

On Wed,  1 Feb 2023 14:20:10 -0500
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:

> After 51cdc8bc120e, we have another deadlock scenario between the
> kvm->lock and the vfio group_lock with two different codepaths acquiring
> the locks in different order.  Specifically in vfio_open_device, vfio
> holds the vfio group_lock when issuing device->ops->open_device but some
> drivers (like vfio-ap) need to acquire kvm->lock during their open_device
> routine;  Meanwhile, kvm_vfio_release will acquire the kvm->lock first
> before calling vfio_file_set_kvm which will acquire the vfio group_lock.
> 
> To resolve this, let's remove the need for the vfio group_lock from the
> kvm_vfio_release codepath.  This is done by introducing a new spinlock to
> protect modifications to the vfio group kvm pointer, and acquiring a kvm
> ref from within vfio while holding this spinlock, with the reference held
> until the last close for the device in question.
> 
> Fixes: 51cdc8bc120e ("kvm/vfio: Fix potential deadlock on vfio group_lock")
> Reported-by: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changes from v1:
> * use spin_lock instead of spin_lock_irqsave (Jason)
> * clear device->kvm_put as part of vfio_kvm_put_kvm (Yi)
> * Re-arrange code to avoid referencing the group contents from within
>   vfio_main (Kevin) which meant moving most of the code in this patch 
>   to group.c along with getting/dropping of the dev_set lock
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/group.c     | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.h      |  1 +
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 11 ++---
>  include/linux/vfio.h     |  2 +-
>  4 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
> index bb24b2f0271e..52f434861294 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
>  #include <linux/vfio.h>
>  #include <linux/iommufd.h>
>  #include <linux/anon_inodes.h>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM
> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> +#endif
>  #include "vfio.h"
>  
>  static struct vfio {
> @@ -154,6 +157,55 @@ static int vfio_group_ioctl_set_container(struct vfio_group *group,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM
> +static bool vfio_kvm_get_kvm_safe(struct vfio_device *device, struct kvm *kvm)

I'm tempted to name these vfio_device_get_kvm_safe() and only pass the
vfio_device, where of course we can get the kvm pointer from the group
internally.

> +{
> +	void (*pfn)(struct kvm *kvm);
> +	bool (*fn)(struct kvm *kvm);
> +	bool ret;
> +

We should assert_lockdep_held(&device->dev_set->lock) in both of these
since that seems to be what's protecting device->kvm and
device->put_kvm.

If we change as above to get the kvm pointer from the group within this
function, we can also move the kvm_ref_lock here, which seems to
simplify the caller quite a bit.

> +	pfn = symbol_get(kvm_put_kvm);
> +	if (WARN_ON(!pfn))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	fn = symbol_get(kvm_get_kvm_safe);
> +	if (WARN_ON(!fn)) {
> +		symbol_put(kvm_put_kvm);
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = fn(kvm);
> +	if (ret)
> +		device->put_kvm = pfn;
> +	else
> +		symbol_put(kvm_put_kvm);
> +
> +	symbol_put(kvm_get_kvm_safe);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_kvm_put_kvm(struct vfio_device *device)
> +{
> +	if (WARN_ON(!device->kvm || !device->put_kvm))
> +		return;

It simplifies the caller if we can use this even in the !device->kvm
case.

> +
> +	device->put_kvm(device->kvm);
> +	device->put_kvm = NULL;
> +	symbol_put(kvm_put_kvm);
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +static bool vfio_kvm_get_kvm_safe(struct vfio_device *device, struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_kvm_put_kvm(struct vfio_device *device)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device *device)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> @@ -164,14 +216,32 @@ static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device *device)
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  	}
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> +
>  	/*
> -	 * Here we pass the KVM pointer with the group under the lock.  If the
> -	 * device driver will use it, it must obtain a reference and release it
> -	 * during close_device.
> +	 * Before the first device open, get the KVM pointer currently
> +	 * associated with the group (if there is one) and obtain a reference
> +	 * now that will be held until the open_count reaches 0 again.  Save
> +	 * the pointer in the device for use by drivers.
>  	 */
> +	if (device->open_count == 0) {
> +		spin_lock(&device->group->kvm_ref_lock);
> +		if (device->group->kvm &&
> +		    vfio_kvm_get_kvm_safe(device, device->group->kvm))
> +			device->kvm = device->group->kvm;
> +		spin_unlock(&device->group->kvm_ref_lock);
> +	}
> +
>  	ret = vfio_device_open(device, device->group->iommufd,
>  			       device->group->kvm);

We're using device->group->kvm outside of kvm_ref_lock here, it should
be using device->kvm.

>  
> +	if (ret && device->kvm && device->open_count == 0) {

Slightly redundant, if device->open_count == 0 here, we can infer ret
is non-zero.

I fiddled with it a little further, see if you like anything from the
version below and incorporate what you do.  Thanks,

Alex

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
index bb24b2f0271e..5121a34e1489 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
 #include <linux/vfio.h>
 #include <linux/iommufd.h>
 #include <linux/anon_inodes.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM
+#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
+#endif
 #include "vfio.h"
 
 static struct vfio {
@@ -154,6 +157,64 @@ static int vfio_group_ioctl_set_container(struct vfio_group *group,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM
+static void vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+	void (*pfn)(struct kvm *kvm);
+	bool (*fn)(struct kvm *kvm);
+	bool ret;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
+
+	spin_lock(&device->group->kvm_ref_lock);
+	if (!device->group->kvm)
+		goto unlock;
+
+	pfn = symbol_get(kvm_put_kvm);
+	if (WARN_ON(!pfn))
+		goto unlock;
+
+	fn = symbol_get(kvm_get_kvm_safe);
+	if (WARN_ON(!fn)) {
+		symbol_put(kvm_put_kvm);
+		goto unlock;
+	}
+
+	ret = fn(device->group->kvm);
+	symbol_put(kvm_get_kvm_safe);
+	if (!ret) {
+		symbol_put(kvm_put_kvm);
+		goto unlock;
+	}
+
+	device->put_kvm = pfn;
+	device->kvm = device->group->kvm;
+unlock:
+	spin_unlock(&device->group->kvm_ref_lock);
+}
+
+static void vfio_device_put_kvm(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
+
+	if (!device->kvm)
+		return;
+
+	if (WARN_ON(!device->put_kvm))
+		goto clear;
+
+	device->put_kvm(device->kvm);
+	device->put_kvm = NULL;
+	symbol_put(kvm_put_kvm);
+
+clear:
+	device->kvm = NULL;
+}
+#else
+static void vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(struct vfio_device *device) {}
+static void vfio_device_put_kvm(struct vfio_device *device) {}
+#endif
+
 static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device *device)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -164,13 +225,23 @@ static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device *device)
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
+	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
+
 	/*
-	 * Here we pass the KVM pointer with the group under the lock.  If the
-	 * device driver will use it, it must obtain a reference and release it
-	 * during close_device.
+	 * Before the first device open, get the KVM pointer currently
+	 * associated with the group (if there is one) and obtain a reference
+	 * now that will be held until the open_count reaches 0 again.  Save
+	 * the pointer in the device for use by drivers.
 	 */
-	ret = vfio_device_open(device, device->group->iommufd,
-			       device->group->kvm);
+	if (device->open_count == 0)
+		vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(device);
+
+	ret = vfio_device_open(device, device->group->iommufd, device->kvm);
+
+	if (device->open_count == 0)
+		vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
 
 out_unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
@@ -180,7 +251,14 @@ static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device *device)
 void vfio_device_group_close(struct vfio_device *device)
 {
 	mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
+
 	vfio_device_close(device, device->group->iommufd);
+
+	if (device->open_count == 0)
+		vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
 	mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
 }
 
@@ -450,6 +528,7 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_alloc(struct iommu_group *iommu_group,
 
 	refcount_set(&group->drivers, 1);
 	mutex_init(&group->group_lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&group->kvm_ref_lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&group->device_list);
 	mutex_init(&group->device_lock);
 	group->iommu_group = iommu_group;
@@ -803,9 +882,9 @@ void vfio_file_set_kvm(struct file *file, struct kvm *kvm)
 	if (!vfio_file_is_group(file))
 		return;
 
-	mutex_lock(&group->group_lock);
+	spin_lock(&group->kvm_ref_lock);
 	group->kvm = kvm;
-	mutex_unlock(&group->group_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&group->kvm_ref_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_set_kvm);
 
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
index f8219a438bfb..20c6bc249cb8 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ struct vfio_group {
 	struct file			*opened_file;
 	struct blocking_notifier_head	notifier;
 	struct iommufd_ctx		*iommufd;
+	spinlock_t			kvm_ref_lock;
 };
 
 int vfio_device_set_group(struct vfio_device *device,
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 5177bb061b17..14dbf781ea8c 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -361,7 +361,6 @@ static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device *device,
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_module_put;
 
-	device->kvm = kvm;
 	if (device->ops->open_device) {
 		ret = device->ops->open_device(device);
 		if (ret)
@@ -370,7 +369,6 @@ static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device *device,
 	return 0;
 
 err_unuse_iommu:
-	device->kvm = NULL;
 	if (iommufd)
 		vfio_iommufd_unbind(device);
 	else
@@ -387,7 +385,6 @@ static void vfio_device_last_close(struct vfio_device *device,
 
 	if (device->ops->close_device)
 		device->ops->close_device(device);
-	device->kvm = NULL;
 	if (iommufd)
 		vfio_iommufd_unbind(device);
 	else
@@ -400,14 +397,14 @@ int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device,
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
+
 	device->open_count++;
 	if (device->open_count == 1) {
 		ret = vfio_device_first_open(device, iommufd, kvm);
 		if (ret)
 			device->open_count--;
 	}
-	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -415,12 +412,12 @@ int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device,
 void vfio_device_close(struct vfio_device *device,
 		       struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
 {
-	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
+
 	vfio_assert_device_open(device);
 	if (device->open_count == 1)
 		vfio_device_last_close(device, iommufd);
 	device->open_count--;
-	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
index 35be78e9ae57..87ff862ff555 100644
--- a/include/linux/vfio.h
+++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
@@ -46,7 +46,6 @@ struct vfio_device {
 	struct vfio_device_set *dev_set;
 	struct list_head dev_set_list;
 	unsigned int migration_flags;
-	/* Driver must reference the kvm during open_device or never touch it */
 	struct kvm *kvm;
 
 	/* Members below here are private, not for driver use */
@@ -58,6 +57,7 @@ struct vfio_device {
 	struct list_head group_next;
 	struct list_head iommu_entry;
 	struct iommufd_access *iommufd_access;
+	void (*put_kvm)(struct kvm *kvm);
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IOMMUFD)
 	struct iommufd_device *iommufd_device;
 	struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd_ictx;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ