lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230201001817.ej7n3ehtgaxwr3pq@treble>
Date:   Tue, 31 Jan 2023 16:18:17 -0800
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To:     Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@...e.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
        jpoimboe@...hat.com, joe.lawrence@...hat.com, pmladek@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] livepatch/shadow: Add garbage collection of
 shadow variables

On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 04:41:22PM -0300, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> The shadow variable type might then be added into a new @shadow_types
> member of struct klp_object. They will get then automatically registered
> and unregistered when the object is being livepatched. The registration
> increments the reference count. Unregistration decreases the reference
> count. All shadow variables of the given type are freed when the reference
> count reaches zero.

How does the automatic unregistration work for replaced patches?

I see klp_unpatch_replaced_patches() is called, but I don't see where it
ends up calling klp_shadow_unregister() for the replaced patch(es).

-- 
Josh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ