linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] module: replace module_layout with module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Feb 2023 00:37:33 +0000
From:   Song Liu <songliubraving@...a.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:     Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
        "linux-modules@...r.kernel.org" <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Kernel Team <kernel-team@...a.com>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] module: replace module_layout with module_memory

Thanks to all for these feedbacks. I will fix the code and send v5. 

> On Jan 31, 2023, at 3:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:21:09AM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
>> +#define for_each_mod_mem_type(type) \
>> + for ((type) = MOD_TEXT; \
>> +     (type) < MOD_MEM_NUM_TYPES; (type)++)
>> 
>> +#define for_core_mod_mem_type(type) \
>> + for ((type) = MOD_TEXT; \
>> +     (type) < MOD_INIT_TEXT; (type)++)
>> +
>> +#define for_init_mod_mem_type(type) \
>> + for ((type) = MOD_INIT_TEXT; \
>> +     (type) < MOD_MEM_NUM_TYPES; (type)++)
> 
> #define __for_each_mod_mem_types(type, _from, _to) \
> for (enum mod_mem_type type = _from; type <= _to; type++;)
> 
> also to be used in the previously suggested within_module_mem_types()
> function.
> 
> also note the C99 variable in for-loop decl thing

Aha, I didn't realize we started using C99 for-loop decl. 

Thanks,
Song

> 
> #define for_code_mod_mem_type(type) \
> __for_each_mod_mem_types(type, MOD_TEXT, MOD_RO_AFTER_INIT)
> 
> #define for_code_mod_mem_type(type) \
> __for_each_mod_mem_types(type, MOD_INIT_TEXT, MOD_INIT_RODATA)
> 
> 
>