linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] dt-bindings: hypervisor: Add dt-bindings for VMBus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230201080546.GA15047@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
Date:   Wed, 1 Feb 2023 00:05:46 -0800
From:   Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, wei.liu@...nel.org,
        decui@...rosoft.com, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, mikelley@...rosoft.com,
        ssengar@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] dt-bindings: hypervisor: Add dt-bindings for VMBus

On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 08:23:48AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 01/02/2023 02:57, Saurabh Singh Sengar wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 07:54:56PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 31/01/2023 19:10, Saurabh Sengar wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>
> >>
> >>> +  - |
> >>> +    / {
> >>> +        compatible = "foo";
> >>> +        model = "foo";
> >>> +        #address-cells = <0x02>;
> >>> +        #size-cells = <0x02>;
> >>
> >> Except previous comments (all of them were ignored),
> > 
> > Thank you for your comments, I have tried to address them all in this version
> > but I may have missed few. I will go and look again all the emails, but if
> > there is any thing which you can point again and we can start a new dicussion
> > from here will be very helpful.
> > 
> > I think one concern was related to use of 'reg' or 'ranges', and I 
> > thought this patch will give clarity that I intend to use 'ranges'
> > without any child node. Is this acceptable ?
> 
> There were several comments.

Ok, let me reply to all of your comments from previous thread to avoid
any confusion. Hope this is fine.

> 
> > 
> > 
> >> also:
> >> Drop entire part. Not related, not correct, not helping and you cannot
> >> have top level nodes in example.
> > 
> > If I dont use the top level node, the parent address cells are assumed to be 1,
> > and I get below warning. If there is better way to address this warning, please
> > suggest I will work on it.
> > 
> > Warning (ranges_format): /example-0/vmbus@...000000:ranges: "ranges" property has invalid length (20 bytes) (parent #address-cells == 1, child #address-cells == 2, #size-cells == 1)
> 
> Then use soc just like every other example.

Thanks for suggestion, I will fix this in V3

Regards,
Saurabh

> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof