lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed,  1 Feb 2023 17:13:32 +0800
From:   Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        stephen.s.brennan@...cle.com, urezki@...il.com, lstoakes@...il.com,
        willy@...radead.org, hch@...radead.org, error27@...il.com,
        Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/7] mm/vmalloc.c: allow vread() to read out vm_map_ram areas

Problem:
***
Stephen reported vread() will skip vm_map_ram areas when reading out
/proc/kcore with drgn utility. Please see below link to get more
details. 

  /proc/kcore reads 0's for vmap_block
  https://lore.kernel.org/all/87ilk6gos2.fsf@oracle.com/T/#u

Root cause:
***
The normal vmalloc API uses struct vmap_area to manage the virtual
kernel area allocated, and associate a vm_struct to store more
information and pass out. However, area reserved through vm_map_ram()
interface doesn't allocate vm_struct to associate with. So the current
code in vread() will skip the vm_map_ram area through 'if (!va->vm)'
conditional checking.

Solution:
***
To mark the area reserved through vm_map_ram() interface, add field 'flags'
into struct vmap_area. Bit 0 indicates this is vm_map_ram area created
through vm_map_ram() interface, bit 1 marks out the type of vm_map_ram area
which makes use of vmap_block to manage split regions via vb_alloc/free().

And also add bitmap field 'used_map' into struct vmap_block to mark those
further subdivided regions being used to differentiate with dirty and free
regions in vmap_block.

With the help of above vmap_area->flags and vmap_block->used_map, we can
recognize and handle vm_map_ram areas successfully. All these are done
in patch 1~3.

Meanwhile, do some improvement on areas related to vm_map_ram areas in
patch 4, 5. And also change area flag from VM_ALLOC to VM_IOREMAP in
patch 6, 7 because this will show them as 'ioremap' in /proc/vmallocinfo,
and exclude them from /proc/kcore.

Testing
***
Only did the basic testing on kvm guest, and run below commands to
access kcore file to do statistics:

	makedumpfile --mem-usage /proc/kcore

Changelog
***
v3->v4:
- Fix typo in pach 2 catched by Lorenzo.
- Add WARN_ON(flags == VMAP_BLOCK) in vread() to address Dan's concern
  that VMAP_BLOCK could be set alone in vmap->flags.
- Add checking on the returned value from xa_load() in vmap_ram_vread(),
  Uladzislau commented on the risk of this place.
- Fix a bug in s_show() which is changed in patch 5. The old change will
  cause 'va->vm is NULL but the VMAP_RAM flag is not set' case wrongly
  handled. Please see below link for details.
  - https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y8aAmuUY9OxrYlLm@kili/T/#u
- Add Uladzislau and Lorenzo's Reviewed-by.

v2->v3:
- Benefited from find_unlink_vmap_area() introduced by Uladzislau, do
  not need to worry about the va->vm and va->flags reset during freeing.
- Change to identify vm_map_area with VMAP_RAM in vmap->flags in
  vread(). 
- Rename the old vb_vread() to vmap_ram_vread().
- Handle two kinds of vm_map_area area reading in vmap_ram_vread()
  respectively. 
- Fix bug of the while loop code block in vmap_block reading, found by
  Lorenzo.
- Improve conditional check related to vm_map_ram area, suggested by
  Lorenzo.

v1->v2:
- Change alloc_vmap_area() to pass in va_flags so that we can pass and
  set vmap_area->flags for vm_map_ram area. With this, no extra action
  need be added to acquire vmap_area_lock when doing the vmap_area->flags
  setting. Uladzislau reviewed v1 and pointed out the issue.
- Improve vb_vread() to cover the case where reading is started from a
  dirty or free region.

RFC->v1:
- Add a new field flags in vmap_area to mark vm_map_ram area. It cold be
  risky reusing the vm union in vmap_area in RFC. I will consider
  reusing the union in vmap_area to save memory later. Now just take the
  simpler way to let's focus on resolving the main problem.
- Add patch 4~7 for optimization.

Baoquan He (7):
  mm/vmalloc.c: add used_map into vmap_block to track space of
    vmap_block
  mm/vmalloc.c: add flags to mark vm_map_ram area
  mm/vmalloc.c: allow vread() to read out vm_map_ram areas
  mm/vmalloc: explicitly identify vm_map_ram area when shown in
    /proc/vmcoreinfo
  mm/vmalloc: skip the uninitilized vmalloc areas
  powerpc: mm: add VM_IOREMAP flag to the vmalloc area
  sh: mm: set VM_IOREMAP flag to the vmalloc area

 arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c |   2 +-
 arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh4/sq.c  |   2 +-
 include/linux/vmalloc.h      |   1 +
 mm/vmalloc.c                 | 126 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 4 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ