[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230201091339.61761-5-bhe@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 17:13:36 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
stephen.s.brennan@...cle.com, urezki@...il.com, lstoakes@...il.com,
willy@...radead.org, hch@...radead.org, error27@...il.com,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/7] mm/vmalloc: explicitly identify vm_map_ram area when shown in /proc/vmcoreinfo
Now, by marking VMAP_RAM in vmap_area->flags for vm_map_ram area, we can
clearly differentiate it with other vmalloc areas. So identify
vm_map_area area by checking VMAP_RAM of vmap_area->flags when shown
in /proc/vmcoreinfo.
Meanwhile, the code comment above vm_map_ram area checking in s_show()
is not needed any more, remove it here.
Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 11 ++++-------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 5a3ea6cb7ec2..e515dbacb0cb 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -4232,14 +4232,11 @@ static int s_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
va = list_entry(p, struct vmap_area, list);
- /*
- * s_show can encounter race with remove_vm_area, !vm on behalf
- * of vmap area is being tear down or vm_map_ram allocation.
- */
if (!va->vm) {
- seq_printf(m, "0x%pK-0x%pK %7ld vm_map_ram\n",
- (void *)va->va_start, (void *)va->va_end,
- va->va_end - va->va_start);
+ if (va->flags & VMAP_RAM)
+ seq_printf(m, "0x%pK-0x%pK %7ld vm_map_ram\n",
+ (void *)va->va_start, (void *)va->va_end,
+ va->va_end - va->va_start);
goto final;
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists