linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Add device tree for Ufispace NCPLite BMC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Feb 2023 11:14:04 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Jordan Chang <jordan.chang@...space.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, joel@....id.au, andrew@...id.au,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, jay.tc.lin@...space.com,
        eason.ys.huang@...space.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Add device tree for Ufispace
 NCPLite BMC

On 01/02/2023 11:06, Jordan Chang wrote:
>>> +     gpio-keys {
>>> +             compatible = "gpio-keys";
>>> +
>>> +             fan-status-int-l {
>>
>> Does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run `make
>> dtbs_check` (see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst
>> for instructions).
>>
>> These will bring warnings. Missing generic name,
>>
> I have run the `make dtbs_check` command, and did not notice the warning
> message 'Missing generic name'. It shows lots of compatible failed messages.
> - /ahb/ftgmac@...70000: failed to match any schema with compatible:

You can run it with DT_SCHEMA_FILES=gpio-keys

> 
>>> +                     label = "fan-status-int-l";
>>> +                     gpios = <&gpio0 ASPEED_GPIO(M, 2) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>> +                     linux,code = <ASPEED_GPIO(M, 2)>;
>>> +             };
>>> +

(...)

>>> +
>>> +&i2c4 {
>>> +     status = "okay";
>>> +
>>> +     psu@58 {
>>> +             compatible = "pmbus";
>>
>> Where is this compatible documented?
> Can not find the corresponding document.
>>
>> Did you run checkpatch? Did it pass without warnings?
> Yes, I did run the ./scripts/checkpatch.pl and there were two warnings left.
> - WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
> - WARNING: line length of 104 exceeds 100 columns
> I just ignore those warnings that Joel has informed me in the previous
> mail loop.
> 

Hm, is it then correct compatible?


Best regards,
Krzysztof