linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] rust: MAINTAINERS: Add the zulip link

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72mGk72tvLx+uH-puXZ=MvAA9dzNVqTXYmPq2iadwYuyWA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Feb 2023 02:38:28 +0100
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc:     rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
        Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
        Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rust: MAINTAINERS: Add the zulip link

On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 8:23 AM Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Zulip organization "rust-for-linux" has been created since about 2 years

"was created about 2 years ago ... and has proven" maybe?

> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/CANiq72=xVaMQkgCA9rspjV8bhWDGqAn4x78B0_4U1WBJYj1PiA@mail.gmail.com/

We typically do links as a tag, like:

    Link: https://..../ [1]

>  R:     Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>
>  R:     Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>
>  L:     rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
> +C:     zulip://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com
>  S:     Supported
>  W:     https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux
>  B:     https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues

The preferred order according to the top of the file is `C:` after
`B:` -- could you please move it? (even if not everybody follows it)

Thanks Boqun!

Also, for reference for others: a few of us discussed a bit in Zulip
whether to use `zulip://` or `https://` here: `zulip://` hints at the
fact that it is possible to join with apps/clients and not just with a
web browser, which is why Boqun wants to use this one. Support for the
URI scheme in place of the `https://` one isn't great in some of the
apps, though, so I worried it could be confusing.

Hopefully the URI scheme support will improve in the future. So let's
try `zulip://` -- it may help getting better support for that URI
scheme too :)

Cheers,
Miguel