[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230201105314.GA5733@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 02:53:14 -0800
From: Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, wei.liu@...nel.org,
decui@...rosoft.com, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, mikelley@...rosoft.com,
ssengar@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: hv: Add dt-bindings for VMBus
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 07:53:07PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/01/2023 17:48, Saurabh Sengar wrote:
> > Add dt-bindings for Hyper-V VMBus
>
> Missing full stop.
>
> Subject: drop second/last, redundant "dt-bindings for". The
> "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
Will fix in v3.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/hv/msft,vmbus.yaml | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hv/msft,vmbus.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hv/msft,vmbus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hv/msft,vmbus.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..66cb426
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hv/msft,vmbus.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/hv/msft,vmbus.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Microsoft Hyper-V VMBus device tree bindings
>
> Drop "device tree bindings"
Will fix in v3
>
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>
> > +
> > +description:
> > + VMBus is a software bus that implement the protocols for communication
> > + between the root or host OS and guest OSs (virtual machines).
>
> Why this cannot be auto-discoverable? Why do you need OF for this?
This is a virtulization device, and I guess we have discussed this in greater
length in other thread.
>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + const: msft,vmbus
> > +
> > + ranges :
> > + const: <0x00 0x00 0x0f 0xf0000000 0x10000000>
>
> Did you test the bindings?
>
> This property does not look correct. If you have static addresses, you
> do not need OF. What do you want to discover here?
fixed in v2
>
> > +
> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - ranges
> > +
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + vmbus {
>
> Use 4 spaces for example indentation.
Fix in v2
>
> > + #address-cells = <0x02>;
> > + #size-cells = <0x01>;
>
> That's not correct style. Drop hex notation. Drop leading zeros.
Will fix in v3
>
> But anyway you did not test the bindings. This cannot work. Try.
>
> > + compatible = "msft,vmbus";
>
> compatible is a first property.
fixed in v2
>
> > + ranges = <0x00 0x00 0x0f 0xf0000000 0x10000000>;
>
> What do you translate? There is no reg, no unit address.
Commented on v2 thread, if there is any further concern using ranges
please let me know.
>
> > + };
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists