linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: mediatek: Add LVTS thermal controllers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGuA+oqGDSQhUGaK8D+NQATJ_c8d0egULdQ+-S0fjHwW4moYKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Feb 2023 14:56:08 +0100
From:   Balsam CHIHI <bchihi@...libre.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
        rafael@...nel.org, amitk@...nel.org, rui.zhang@...el.com,
        matthias.bgg@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, rdunlap@...radead.org,
        ye.xingchen@....com.cn, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        khilman@...libre.com, james.lo@...iatek.com,
        rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: mediatek: Add LVTS thermal controllers

Hi Krzysztof,

On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 2:37 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 01/02/2023 14:34, Balsam CHIHI wrote:
> >>> +
> >>> +properties:
> >>> +  compatible:
> >>> +    enum:
> >>> +      - mediatek,mt8195-lvts-ap
> >>> +      - mediatek,mt8195-lvts-mcu
> >>
> >> What about other devices? You called the file name as generic for all
> >> Mediatek SoCs, so why only one SoC is here? Is there going to be more?
> >> If yes, why they cannot be added now?
> >
> > Yes, there is another MTK SoC mt8192 that supports LVTS,
> > I was asked in v10 of the series to remove the unimplemented SoC.
> > It will be added later with the driver that supports it.
> > just let me know if you still want to add mt8192 bindings in the next
> > version without the driver.
>
> The binding should be complete, if that's possible, so if you had mt8192
> already there, it could stay. Anyway it's fine then.

OK, I will put back mt8192 dt-bindings.
this is the link to the v10 patch
"https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/patch/20230112152855.216072-3-bchihi@baylibre.com/",
it will be the same in next version (v13) of series.
it would be great if you review it in advance, so I could take into
account the new changes if needed.
is it possible to resend this patch under v13, to simplify the review
and avoid breaking the series again?

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>

Best regards,
Balsam