[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9p57qn9+Pig9igE@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 14:40:46 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <quic_mohs@...cinc.com>
Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, agross@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
quic_plai@...cinc.com, bgoswami@...cinc.com,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, quic_rohkumar@...cinc.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, swboyd@...omium.org,
judyhsiao@...omium.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] ASoC: qcom: SC7280: audioreach: Add sc7280
hardware param fixup callback
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 07:19:35PM +0530, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
> +#define DEFAULT_SAMPLE_RATE_48K 48000
Why are we bothering with a define here given that the define also
encodes the value and it's only used in once place?
> for_each_card_prelinks(card, i, link) {
> link->init = sc7280_init;
> link->ops = &sc7280_ops;
> + if (link->no_pcm == 1)
> + link->be_hw_params_fixup = sc7280_snd_be_hw_params_fixup;
We only set the fixup in the case where there's no PCM but we removed
the constraint in all cases - isn't the constraint needed otherwise?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists