[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1afe8de217d4436b6cdc91d65729c9baacff9274.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 13:15:22 +1100
From: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: sudhakar@...ux.ibm.com, bgray@...ux.ibm.com, erichte@...ux.ibm.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, nayna@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zohar@...ux.ibm.com,
gjoyce@...ux.ibm.com, ruscur@...sell.cc, gcwilson@...ux.ibm.com,
joel@....id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 22/24] powerpc/pseries: Implement secvars for dynamic
secure boot
On Tue, 2023-01-31 at 18:55 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > > > + var.datalen = 1;
> > > > + var.data = kzalloc(1, GFP_KERNEL);
> > >
> > > This could just point to a u8 on stack I think?
> >
> > Until we get VMAP_STACK and we'll have to switch back.
>
> AFAIKS plpks_read_var does not require linear map, so should not be
> required. IMO that's the right way to go for an external API, so
> actually plpks_write_var is the outlier there and should be changed
> to follow read and remove in not requiring special pointers.
Indeed, I was confused - in the read case, the buffer doesn't get
directly passed to the hcall.
I'll wait a little bit longer for more feedback on v5 of this series
and maybe fix this in v6 if mpe thinks I should respin it again.
--
Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra
ajd@...ux.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited
Powered by blists - more mailing lists