[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9qK3nJHjU4Bvxaf@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 11:53:02 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@...el.com, yi.l.liu@...el.com, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] iommufd: Add devices_users to track the
hw_pagetable usage by device
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 10:57:13PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 04:35:35PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> > IMHO I would structure the smmu driver so that all the different
> > iommu_domain formats have their own ops pointer. The special
> > "undecided" format would have a special ops with only attach_dev and
> > at first attach it would switch the ops to whatever format it
> > selected.
> >
> > I think this could get rid of a lot of the 'if undecided/S1/S2/CD'
> > complexity all over the place. You know what type it is because you
> > were called on a op that is only called on its type.
>
> An auto/unmanaged domain allocation via iommu_domain_alloc() would
> be S1, while an allocation via ops->domain_alloc_user can be S1 or
> S2 with a given parameter/flag. So, actually the format is always
> decided.
No, it can't decide the S1/S2 format until it knows the smmu because
of this:
/* Restrict the stage to what we can actually support */
if (!(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_TRANS_S1))
smmu_domain->stage = ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S2;
if (!(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_TRANS_S2))
smmu_domain->stage = ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1;
So the format is never decided.
> that we don't pass the dev pointer down to ops->domain_alloc. So,
> the SMMU driver can't know which SMMU device the device is behind,
> resulting in being unable to finalizing the domain. Robin mentioned
> that he has a patch "iommu: Pass device through ops->domain_alloc".
> Perhaps that is required for us to entirely fix the add_domain()
> problem?
Robin is making progress, hopefully soon
So the issue is with replace you need to have the domain populated
before we can call replace but you can't populate the domain until it
is bound because of the above issue? That seems unsovlable without
fixing up the driver.
I'd say replace can go ahead ingoring that issue and that for now
replace will only work on ARM with domains created by
domain_alloc_user that are fully configured.
It will start working correctly for auto domains once Robin's changes
get finished.
Is there another issue?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists