linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: openvswitch: fix flow memory leak in ovs_flow_cmd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y9qZRCn7CLhYr5h3@corigine.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Feb 2023 17:54:28 +0100
From:   Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To:     Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@...ras.ru>
Cc:     Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@....org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        dev@...nvswitch.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>,
        lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: openvswitch: fix flow memory leak in
 ovs_flow_cmd_new

On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 07:28:09PM +0300, Fedor Pchelkin wrote:
> On 2/1/23 6:45 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > I see this would work by virtue of kfree(key) doing nothing
> > of key is NULL, the error case in question. And that otherwise key is
> > non-NULL if this path is hit.
> > 
> > However, the idiomatic approach to error handling is for the error path
> > to unwind resource allocations in the reverse order that they were made.
> > And for goto labels to control how far to unwind.
> > 
> 
> You are right, thanks. Have to keep 'goto' structured, otherwise there
> would be a 'goto' mess.
> 
> > So I think the following would be more in keeping with the intention of the
> > code. Even if it is a somewhat more verbose change.
> > 
> > *compile tested only!*
> 
> I'll test this on error paths and resend the patch.

Thanks, much appreciated.