linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 2/5] rust: sync: Arc: Introduces ArcInner::count()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 2 Feb 2023 08:10:19 -0800
From:   Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
        Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
        Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/5] rust: sync: Arc: Introduces ArcInner::count()

On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 04:41:47PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 02:21:53PM +0000, Gary Guo wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 10:14:06 +0100
> > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:22:41PM -0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > > > This allows reading the current count of a refcount in an `ArcInner`.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  rust/helpers.c          | 6 ++++++
> > > >  rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs | 9 +++++++++
> > > >  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/rust/helpers.c b/rust/helpers.c
> > > > index 09a4d93f9d62..afc5f1a39fef 100644
> > > > --- a/rust/helpers.c
> > > > +++ b/rust/helpers.c
> > > > @@ -46,6 +46,12 @@ bool rust_helper_refcount_dec_and_test(refcount_t *r)
> > > >  }
> > > >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rust_helper_refcount_dec_and_test);
> > > >  
> > > > +unsigned int rust_helper_refcount_read(refcount_t *r)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	return refcount_read(r);
> > > > +}
> > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rust_helper_refcount_read);
> > > > +
> > > >  /*
> > > >   * We use `bindgen`'s `--size_t-is-usize` option to bind the C `size_t` type
> > > >   * as the Rust `usize` type, so we can use it in contexts where Rust
> > > > diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs
> > > > index fc680a4a795c..fbfceaa3096e 100644
> > > > --- a/rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs
> > > > +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs
> > > > @@ -127,6 +127,15 @@ struct ArcInner<T: ?Sized> {
> > > >      data: T,
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > +impl<T: ?Sized> ArcInner<T> {
> > > > +    /// Returns the current reference count of [`ArcInner`].
> > > > +    fn count(&self) -> u32 {
> > > > +        // SAFETY: `self.refcount.get()` is always a valid pointer, and `refcount_read()` is a
> > > > +        // normal atomic read (i.e. no data race) only requiring on the address is valid.
> > > > +        unsafe { bindings::refcount_read(self.refcount.get()) }
> > > > +    }
> > > > +}  
> > > 
> > > This is completely unsafe vs concurrency. In order to enable correct
> > > tracing of refcount manipulations we have the __refcount_*(.oldp) API.
> > 
> > Retrieving the reference count is safe. It's just that in many
> > scenarios it's very hard to use the retrieved reference count
> > correctly, because it might be concurrently changed.
> 
> Yes, so you really should never ever ever care about the value, and that
> includes printing it out as it will be wrong the instant you read it.
> 

Agreed.

> > But there are correct ways to use a refcount, e.g. if you own
> > `Arc` and `.count()` returns 1, then you know that you are the
> > exclusive owner of the `Arc` and nobody else is going to touch it.
> 
> But you should never know this, as it is not relevant.
> 
> So no, please don't allow printing out of a reference count, that will
> only cause problems and allow people to think it is safe to do so.
> 

People already do it, even in *security* code,

security/keys/keyring.c:

	int key_link(struct key *keyring, struct key *key)
	{
		...
		kenter("{%d,%d}", keyring->serial, refcount_read(&keyring->usage));
		...
	}

Should we fix that?

Actually It is *safe* to do it, the existence of `ArcInner` proves the
object can not be freed while reading the refcount. This is somewhat
similar to the data_race() macro, we know there is a data race, but we
don't care because of the way that we are going to use the value won't
cause a problem.

What I propose is to print it in debug fmt only, anyway I'm OK to remove
it, but I'm really confused about the reasoning here.

Regards,
Boqun

> Peter is right, please don't do this.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h