[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 15:53:04 -0500
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpuset: Fix cpuset_cpus_allowed() to not filter
offline CPUs
On 2/2/23 15:48, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 03:46:02PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
>>>> I will work on a patchset to do that as a counter offer.
>>> We will need a small and simple patch for /urgent, or I will need to
>>> revert all your patches -- your call.
>>>
>>> I also don't tihnk you fully appreciate the ramifications of
>>> task_cpu_possible_mask(), cpuset currently gets that quite wrong.
>> OK, I don't realize the urgency of that. If it is that urgent, I will have
>> no objection to get it in for now. We can improve it later on. So are you
>> planning to get it into the current 6.2 rc or 6.3?
>>
>> Tejun, are you OK with that as you are the cgroup maintainer?
> Yeah, gotta fix the regression but is there currently a solution which fixes
> the regression but doesn't further break other stuff?
I believe there is a better way to do that, but it will need more time
to flex out. Since cpuset_cpus_allowed() is only used by
kernel/sched/core.c, Peter will be responsible if it somehow breaks
other stuff.
Thanks,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists