[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 22:30:30 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
arjan@...ux.intel.com
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org, mimoja@...oja.de,
hewenliang4@...wei.com, thomas.lendacky@....com, seanjc@...gle.com,
pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de, fam.zheng@...edance.com,
punit.agrawal@...edance.com, simon.evans@...edance.com,
liangma@...ngbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/11] x86/smpboot: Support parallel startup of
secondary CPUs
On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 21:56 +0000, Usama Arif wrote:
> @@ -1515,6 +1530,17 @@ void __init native_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>
> speculative_store_bypass_ht_init();
>
> + /*
> + * We can do 64-bit AP bringup in parallel if the CPU reports its
> + * APIC ID in CPUID leaf 0x0B. Otherwise it's too hard. And not
> + * for SEV-ES guests because they can't use CPUID that early.
> + * Also, some AMD CPUs crash when doing parallel cpu bringup, disable
> + * it for all AMD CPUs to be on the safe side.
> + */
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32) || boot_cpu_data.cpuid_level < 0x0B ||
> + cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_STATE_ENCRYPT))
> + do_parallel_bringup = false;
> +
> snp_set_wakeup_secondary_cpu();
> }
Oops, I thought I'd removed those two lines about AMD in the comment
when I removed the actual code that did so. Turns out we remove those
lines again in the *next* patch instead.
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (5965 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists