[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 11:50:03 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>,
Imre Kaloz <kaloz@...nwrt.org>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khalasa@...p.pl>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>,
- <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] dt-bindings: serial/mtd/mc/ata: use MC peripheral
props
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 10:32:14AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dependencies
> ============
> I think entire patchset should go via one tree (Rob's). Patch #2 depends on
> patch #1. Patch #3 could go separate tree as long as others are in the
> linux-next. However for simplicity let's push everything through Rob's DT
> tree?
No objection from me:
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists